The new Food Arts came today and I inhaled it. It’s the industry rag for chefs and it’s chock full of gossip, openings and closings. But I love the menu previews the best, where the chefs show a few dishes from their new menus and then give verbal run-on recipes (“take that jus and reduce it to a syrup . . .”). They read more like poetry than instruction.
I spend all my time writing really precise recipes now, measuring black pepper by the 1/8 teaspoon, but when during my first really serious cooking job I remember being struck by the simple beauty of a celery root puree recipe the other garde manger (cold appetizer cook) passed to me. It had arrows showing the order of composition and, also, the passage of time:
“brown butter-->shallot-->celery root-->sweat out all the way-->white wine, reduce-->fill up with half-milk/half-veg stock.”
Written on frayed-top pages ripped from mini-notebooks, recipes were folded into thick squares and passed quietly through the kitchen. As in any good game of telephone, their contents changed in the hands of the most recent player, the last cook’s sauce tasting totally different from the first cook’s. In this way, the recipes were transmitted almost orally, and these scraps were just shreds of folkloric history.
Nowhere in such a recipe does it say how much to add. Whether you're making a small batch of sauce or a large batch, when you deglaze with wine it is assumed that you add enough to just cover the bottom of the cooking pan, and when you add stock you add just enough to reach to the top level of the solids, the vegetables, scraps, etc.
In fact, these recipe had a lot less to do with what you do (because a line cook should know) and more about when, and making any sense of it at all depended on a shared visual knowledge. When the butter has browned, add the shallots. When the shallots have softened, add the celeriac (thinly sliced, of course.)
Here’s another one.
Monk sauce refers to the pool of burgundy sauce we served with the pan-roasted monkfish. Made from a base of reduced veal stock (75%) and chicken stock (25%), if was fortified with port wine, cherry tomatoes, of course mirepoix (celery, onions and carrots) and then set to steep with cilantro stems and white peppercorns. Finally, we strained it through a fine mesh chinois, and then again through cheesecloth. The cook here wrote “fishnet,” and it’s possible he had sexy stockings on the brain, but I’m pretty sure he meant cheesecloth. I don’t remember whose recipe this was. My guess, he was European.
What’s interesting here is that these recipes don’t concern themselves with the time it takes to do something. What I mean is this: Recipes for home cooks give you two clues to move on to the next step: a visual cue (when something has browned, for instance) and then a time (about 10 minutes). Cooks recipes don’t specify how long, but rather concentrate on what level of cooked-ness it should have, which is far more precise.
I wish that recipes for home cooks were written this way because I feel like the double-pronged direction (the time plus the visual) sometimes trips up the reader. I know it does for me, on the rare occasion that I follow a recipe. How should you know which one to follow? (Pete Wells’ NYT essay this week touches on this. Love it.)
For that matter, how’s a person supposed to know when the vegetable is done “sweating?”
You know what? You’ll recognize the beauty when you see it. A vegetable has finished sweating when it has fully succumbed to the heat. The slices will look wilted and show the beginning spots of rusty caramelization. It will have surrendered its juices to the butter. At this point add the stock and cook it a little further into submission . . . and after that, when you puree it, it will taste more purely of that vegetable than you thought possible. Give it a taste and virtually file away the memory of that flavor. In the end, I’ve come to realize that taste-memory is far more precise than any recipe, no matter how loose or how detailed.
You know what? You’ll recognize the beauty when you see it. A vegetable has finished sweating when it has fully succumbed to the heat. The slices will look wilted and show the beginning spots of rusty caramelization. It will have surrendered its juices to the butter. At this point add the stock and cook it a little further into submission . . . and after that, when you puree it, it will taste more purely of that vegetable than you thought possible. Give it a taste and virtually file away the memory of that flavor. In the end, I’ve come to realize that taste-memory is far more precise than any recipe, no matter how loose or how detailed.
